Gonzales v. Price et al
Filing
77
ORDER granting 76 Motion to modify scheduling order signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 11/7/2011. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
MICHAEL GONZALES,
CASE NO.
1:07-cv-01391-AWI-GBC (PC)
9
Plaintiff,
10
11
v.
PRICE, et al.,
12
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO MODIFY
SCHEDULING ORDER
(Doc. 76)
Defendants.
13
DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS DUE FORTY-FIVE
DAYS FOLLOWING COURT’S RULING ON
/ PENDING DISCOVERY MOTIONS
14
15
Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
16
On November 2, 2011, Defendants filed a motion to modify scheduling order to extend the
17
dispositive motions deadline. Doc. 76. On January 7, 2011, the Court issued a scheduling order
18
setting the dispositive motions deadline for November 17, 2011. Doc. 34. Defendants request to
19
extend the dispositive motions deadline to forty-five days following the Court’s ruling on the eight
20
pending discovery motions. See Docs. 46, 53, 58, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67. Modification of schedule
21
requires a showing of good cause. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). Good cause having been presented to the
22
court, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
Defendants’ motion to modify scheduling order is GRANTED. Dispositive motions shall be
2
filed no later than forty-five days following the Court's ruling on the eight pending discovery
3
motions.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated:
0jh02o
November 7, 2011
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?