Jackson v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al

Filing 68

ORDER signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/19/2012 continuing cross-motions for summary judgment from court's calendar pending expiration of objection and response deadlines re 52 , 56 . (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8

FATEEM L. JACKSON,

9

Plaintiff,

10
11

CASE NO. 1:07-cv-01414-LJO-SKO PC
ORDER CONTINUING CROSS-MOTIONS
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FROM
COURT’S CALENDAR PENDING
EXPIRATION OF OBJECTION AND
RESPONSE DEADLINES

v.
CDCR EMPLOYEES, et al.,

12

Defendants.

(Docs. 52 and 56)
/

13
14

The parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment are pending before the Court. The

15

Magistrate Judge has issued Findings and Recommendations recommending that Defendants be

16

granted qualified immunity, which will conclude this action in its entirety. On March 12, 2012,

17

Plaintiff was granted a thirty-day extension of time to file his objections. Accordingly, in light of

18

28 U.S.C. § 476(a)(1), the Civil Justice Reform Act, the parties’ cross-motions for summary

19

judgment are ORDERED CONTINUED from the Court’s calendar pending expiration of the

20

objection and response deadlines. Local Rule 304.1

21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23

Dated:
b9ed48

March 19, 2012

/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

24
25
26
27
28

1

This order is solely administrative and nothing is required of the parties.

1