EEOC v. ABM Janitorial Services, Inc.

Filing 164

ORDER Continue Hearing on Defendants' 138 MOTION for SANCTIONS and Mandating further Mediation: Motion Hearing currently set for 2/22/2010 has been moved to 3/1/2010 at 10:00 AM in Bakersfield at 18th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 2/10/2010. (Kusamura, W)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 On January 13, 2010, defendants' (referred collectively here as "ABM") filed a motion for a sanctions against the plaintiffs and seeking an order mandating further mediation. ABM scheduled the hearing on this motion to be heard on February 22, 2010. In the meantime, a third-party filed a motion to intervene in the matter. The hearing on this motion to intervene is scheduled for March 1, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. Since this time, ABM filed a motion for protective order related to production of certain documents. The parties have stipulated that the hearing on the motion for protective order will be heard on March 1, 2010. U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ERIKA MORALES and ANONYMOUS ) PLAINTIFF'S ONE THROUGH EIGHT ) ) Plaintiff-Intervenors ) v. ) ) ) ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED, ) et al. ) ) Defendants. ) ) 1:07-cv-01428 LJO JLT ORDER CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AND MANDATING FURTHER MEDIATION TO MARCH 1, 2010 AT 10:00 A.M. [Doc 138] IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 In order to preserve judicial resources, the Court ORDERS the motion for a sanctions against the plaintiffs and mandating further mediation will be continued to March 1, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. concurrently with the other motions on calendar. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 9, 2010 9j7khi /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?