Blackman v. Sims et al

Filing 8

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS 6 ; ORDER Dismissing Action signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/3/2008. CASE CLOSED.(Esteves, C)

Download PDF
(PC) Blackman v. Sims et al Doc. 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff, Tony Blackman ("plaintiff"), is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States vs. ORDER DISMISSING ACTION RICHARD M. SIMS, et al., Defendants. / TONY BLACKMAN, Plaintiff, 1:07-cv-01447-LJO-GSA-P ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 6) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. On November 28, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and a Recommendation herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the Findings and Recommendation were to be filed within thirty (30) days. On January 2, 2008, plaintiff filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation. // 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendation to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed November 28, 2007, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and, 2. This action is DISMISSED, without prejudice, based on plaintiff's failure to obey the court's order of October 9, 2007. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: b9ed48 February 3, 2008 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?