Petteay v. Avenal State Prison Medical Department et al

Filing 19

ORDER ADOPTING 18 Findings and Recommendations and GRANTING 16 Motion to Dismiss action without prejudice for failure to exhaust signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 1/26/2009. CASE CLOSED. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /// /// 1 Plaintiff Lovette Petteay ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. On December 15, 2008, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations recommending Defendant Henry's motion to dismiss be granted. The parties were given fifteen days within which to file any objections. No objections were filed. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed December 15, 2008, is adopted in full; and v. AVENAL STATE PRISON, et al., Defendants. / LOVETTE PETTEAY, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:07-cv-01496-OWW-SMS PC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, AND GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS ACTION, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST (Docs. 16 and 18) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. Defendant's motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust, filed September 2, 2008, is GRANTED and this action is dismissed without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 26, 2009 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?