Boyd v. Robles et al

Filing 53

ORDER signed by District Judge Raner Collins on 1/14/2010. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff must file a response to Defendants 51 Motion to Dismiss, together with copies of grievances, sworn declarations or other admissible evidence,no later than February 5, 2010. Filing Deadline: 2/5/2010. (Bradley, A)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendant has filed a Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #51) pursuant to Rule 37 and 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. NOTICE--WARNING TO PLAINTIFF Defendants' Motion to Dismiss seeks to have your case dismissed. A motion to dismiss under Rule 37 or 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will, if granted, end your case. You must timely respond to all motions. The Court may, in its discretion, treat your failure to respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss as a consent to the granting of that Motion without further notice, and judgment may be entered dismissing this action. See Brydges v. Lewis, 18 F.3d 651 (9th Cir. 1994) (per curiam). vs. A. Robles, Defendant. Rickey Donnell Boyd, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 07-1510-TUC-RCC ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff must file a response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, together with copies of grievances, sworn declarations or other admissible evidence, no later than February 5, 2010. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants may file a reply within 15 days after service of Plaintiff's response. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss will be deemed ready for decision without oral argument on the day following the date set for filing a reply unless otherwise ordered by the Court.

DATED this 14th day of January, 2010.

-2-