Jonathan Lee Riches v. Dan Rather et al
ORDER Denying 10 Motion For Judges' Recusal signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 1/16/2009. (Esteves, C)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 JONATHAN LEE RICHES, 8 9 Plaintiff, 10 v. 11 DAN RATHER, et al., 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 6i0kij Plaintiff, a federal prisoner in South Carolina filed this action on October 19, 2007. On December 11, 2007, the court dismissed the case finding that the claim was frivolous. Plaintiff filed an appeal on January 15, 2008. The appeal was dismissed by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on April 21, 2008. On January 15, 2009, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting that every judge involved in this case recuse themselves. The motion is unintelligible and nonsensical and appears to be filed only to vex the court and parties. Moreover, this court no longer has jurisdiction over this case as Plaintiff appealed this court's order to the Ninth Circuit and the appeal was dismissed. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion is DENIED. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:07cv1523 LJO GSA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT E A S T E R N DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR JUDGES' RECUSAL (Doc. 10)
January 16, 2009
/s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?