Smith v. Schwarzenegger et al
Filing
168
ORDER on Motions for Extensions 163 , 165 , signed by District Judge Susan R. Bolton on 7/21/15. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
FRESNO DIVISION
9
10
Michael Lenoir Smith,
Plaintiff,
11
12
ORDER
v.
13
No. CV 1-07-1547-PHX-SRB
Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
16
The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s Third Motion for Court Order Access to the
17
Court’s Prison Library and Court Order for Continuance to Respond to Defendants’
18
Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 163) and Plaintiff’s Second Motion for Extension
19
of Time to File Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 165).
20
No response has been filed to either motion. After reviewing the docket and Plaintiff’s
21
letter dated July 5, 2015 (Doc. 167) it appears that Plaintiff did not received this Court’s
22
Order dated June 9, 2015 (Doc. 160) extending his time to respond to Defendants’
23
Motion for Summary Judgment until June 26, 2015 until after the response deadline had
24
past.
25
IT IS ORDERED granting Plaintiff’s Third Motion for Court Order Access to the
26
Court’s Prison Library and Court Order for Continuance to Respond to Defendants’
27
Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiff’s Second Motion for Extension of Time to
28
File Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. (Docs. 163 and 165)
1
2
3
4
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff may have until August 20, 2015 to file
his Response to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no further extensions will be granted.
5
6
Dated this 21st day of July, 2015.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?