Ranzon v. State of California, et al
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this Action be DISMISSED, With Prejudice, Based on Plaintiff's Failure to State Any Claims Upon Which Relief May Be Granted Under Section 1983 re 1 Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 9/18/2009. Referred to Judge Wanger. Objections to F&R due by 10/21/2009. (Jessen, A)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 / 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Murrand Ranzon ("Plaintiff") is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on November 8, 2007. (Doc. 1.) On July 23, 2009, the undersigned dismissed Plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and gave Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint within thirty days. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). (Doc.10.) To date, Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the Court's order. As a result, there is no pleading on file which sets forth any claims upon which relief may be granted under section 1983. Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the undersigned HEREBY RECOMMENDS that this action be dismissed, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff's failure to state any claims upon which relief may be granted under section 1983. 1 v. THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS MURRAND RANZON, Plaintiff, 1:07-cv-01619-OWW-GSA-PC FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED (Doc. 1.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within thirty (30) days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, Plaintiff may file written objections with the Court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 6i0kij
September 18, 2009
/s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?