Aubert v. Elijah et al
Filing
79
ORDER Adopting FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (ECF No. 76 ), signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/26/2013. This action is referred to the Magistrate Judge for further pretrial proceedings as to Defendants Elijah and Garcia.(Fahrney, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
ESS’N AUBERT,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
KEVIN ELIJAH, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________)
NO. 1:07 cv 001629 AWI GSA PC
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
(ECF No. 76 )
15
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. The matter was
17
referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule
18
302.
19
On March 1, 2013, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that
20
Defendant Garcia’s motion for summary judgment be denied. The parties were provided twenty
21
days in which to file objections. To date, no objections to the findings and recommendations
22
have been filed.
23
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 305, this
24
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
25
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.
26
Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:
27
1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on March 1,
28
1
2013, are adopted in full.
2
2. Defendant Garcia’s motion for summary judgment is denied.
3
3. This action is referred to the Magistrate Judge for further pretrial proceedings as to
4
Defendants Elijah and Garcia.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
Dated:
March 26, 2013
/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
B9ed48
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?