Aubert v. Elijah et al

Filing 79

ORDER Adopting FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (ECF No. 76 ), signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/26/2013. This action is referred to the Magistrate Judge for further pretrial proceedings as to Defendants Elijah and Garcia.(Fahrney, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 ESS’N AUBERT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) KEVIN ELIJAH, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) NO. 1:07 cv 001629 AWI GSA PC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (ECF No. 76 ) 15 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. The matter was 17 referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 18 302. 19 On March 1, 2013, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that 20 Defendant Garcia’s motion for summary judgment be denied. The parties were provided twenty 21 days in which to file objections. To date, no objections to the findings and recommendations 22 have been filed. 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 305, this 24 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 25 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. 26 Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that: 27 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on March 1, 28 1 2013, are adopted in full. 2 2. Defendant Garcia’s motion for summary judgment is denied. 3 3. This action is referred to the Magistrate Judge for further pretrial proceedings as to 4 Defendants Elijah and Garcia. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: March 26, 2013 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill B9ed48 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?