Pinnacle Armor, Inc. vs. USA

Filing 76

STIPULATION REGARDING DEFENDANT'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT REVISED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD AND ORDER ADOPTING REVISED BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND VACATING HEARING signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on December 21, 2012. (Munoz, I)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 STUART F. DELERY Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General VINCENT M. GARVEY Deputy Director TAMRA T. MOORE Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division Federal Programs Branch 20 Massachusetts Ave. NW Washington, D.C. 20530 Telephone: (202) 514-8095 Facsimile: (202) 616-8460 E-Mail: Tamra.Moore@usdoj.gov District of Columbia Bar BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney Eastern District of California JEFFREY J. LODGE Assistant United States Attorney United States Courthouse 2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401 Fresno, California 93271 Telephone: (559) 497-4000 Attorneys for Defendant United States 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 PINNACLE ARMOR, INC., 17 Plaintiff, 18 vs. 19 20 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,1 Defendant. 21 22 23 24 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: cv-07-1655 (LJO) STIPULATION REGARDING DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT REVISED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD ORDER ADOPTING REVISED BREIFING SCHEDULE AND VACATING HEARING 25 26 1 27 28 Although the caption of plaintiff’s First Amended Verified Complaint (“FAVC”) identifies the United States of America as the defendant in this lawsuit, plaintiff’s FAVC states that this suit is brought against the United States Department of Justice and the National Institute of Justice (collectively, “the NIJ” or “the Government”). STIPULATION REGARDING DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT REVISED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD - 1 1 2 Plaintiff, Pinnacle Armor, Inc., and defendant, the National Institute of Justice (“NIJ”), stipulate, pursuant to Local Rule 6-144(a) and subject to this Court’s approval, that: 3 4 5 6 7 1. NIJ has until January 11, 2013, to respond to plaintiff’s Motion to Supplement Revised Administrative Record; 2. Plaintiff has until January 25, 2013, to file its reply in support of its Motion to Supplement Revised Administrative Record; and 8 9 10 11 12 13 3. The hearing on plaintiff’s Motion to Supplement Revised Administrative Record shall take place on February 1, 2013. Counsel for the NIJ requested an extension of time to respond to plaintiff’s motion in November due to work obligations. Counsel for NIJ now seeks this additional enlargement of time due to her own illness and the upcoming holidays, during which time agency counsel will 14 15 be out of the office. Counsel for plaintiff does not oppose this request. 16 17 Dated: December 21, 2012 18 s/ Eric H. Saiki_____________ ERIC H. SAIKI 19 Counsel for Plaintiff 20 21 Dated: December 21, 2012 s/ Tamra T. Moore_____________ TAMRA T. MOORE 22 Counsel for Defendant 23 24 25 ORDER Based on the above stipulation of all parties to this action, the Court directs that: Defendant’s response to plaintiffs’ Motion to Supplement Revised Administrative Record be 26 27 28 filed on or before January 11, 2013; and Plaintiff’s reply in support of its Motion to Supplement Revised Administrative Record be filed on or before January 25, 2013. STIPULATION REGARDING DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT REVISED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD - 2 Given the nature of the motion, the Court is of the opinion that a hearing will be 1 2 unnecessary, and hereby VACATES the hearing on plaintiff’s motion, originally set for 8:30 AM 3 in Courtroom 4 on February 1, 2013, pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). Should the papers raise 4 issues on which the Court believes oral argument would be helpful, the hearing will be reset. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: 8 December 21, 2012 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 9 10 b2e55c0d 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION REGARDING DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT REVISED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD - 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?