Pinnacle Armor, Inc. vs. USA
Filing
76
STIPULATION REGARDING DEFENDANT'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT REVISED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD AND ORDER ADOPTING REVISED BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND VACATING HEARING signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on December 21, 2012. (Munoz, I)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
STUART F. DELERY
Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General
VINCENT M. GARVEY
Deputy Director
TAMRA T. MOORE
Trial Attorney
U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division
Federal Programs Branch
20 Massachusetts Ave. NW
Washington, D.C. 20530
Telephone: (202) 514-8095
Facsimile: (202) 616-8460
E-Mail: Tamra.Moore@usdoj.gov
District of Columbia Bar
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
Eastern District of California
JEFFREY J. LODGE
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Courthouse
2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401
Fresno, California 93271
Telephone: (559) 497-4000
Attorneys for Defendant United States
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
PINNACLE ARMOR, INC.,
17
Plaintiff,
18
vs.
19
20
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,1
Defendant.
21
22
23
24
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: cv-07-1655 (LJO)
STIPULATION REGARDING
DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT
REVISED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
ORDER ADOPTING REVISED BREIFING
SCHEDULE AND VACATING HEARING
25
26
1
27
28
Although the caption of plaintiff’s First Amended Verified Complaint (“FAVC”) identifies the
United States of America as the defendant in this lawsuit, plaintiff’s FAVC states that this suit is
brought against the United States Department of Justice and the National Institute of Justice
(collectively, “the NIJ” or “the Government”).
STIPULATION REGARDING DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT REVISED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD - 1
1
2
Plaintiff, Pinnacle Armor, Inc., and defendant, the National Institute of Justice (“NIJ”),
stipulate, pursuant to Local Rule 6-144(a) and subject to this Court’s approval, that:
3
4
5
6
7
1. NIJ has until January 11, 2013, to respond to plaintiff’s Motion to Supplement
Revised Administrative Record;
2. Plaintiff has until January 25, 2013, to file its reply in support of its Motion to
Supplement Revised Administrative Record; and
8
9
10
11
12
13
3. The hearing on plaintiff’s Motion to Supplement Revised Administrative Record shall
take place on February 1, 2013.
Counsel for the NIJ requested an extension of time to respond to plaintiff’s motion in
November due to work obligations. Counsel for NIJ now seeks this additional enlargement of
time due to her own illness and the upcoming holidays, during which time agency counsel will
14
15
be out of the office. Counsel for plaintiff does not oppose this request.
16
17
Dated: December 21, 2012
18
s/ Eric H. Saiki_____________
ERIC H. SAIKI
19
Counsel for Plaintiff
20
21
Dated: December 21, 2012
s/ Tamra T. Moore_____________
TAMRA T. MOORE
22
Counsel for Defendant
23
24
25
ORDER
Based on the above stipulation of all parties to this action, the Court directs that:
Defendant’s response to plaintiffs’ Motion to Supplement Revised Administrative Record be
26
27
28
filed on or before January 11, 2013; and Plaintiff’s reply in support of its Motion to Supplement
Revised Administrative Record be filed on or before January 25, 2013.
STIPULATION REGARDING DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT REVISED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD - 2
Given the nature of the motion, the Court is of the opinion that a hearing will be
1
2
unnecessary, and hereby VACATES the hearing on plaintiff’s motion, originally set for 8:30 AM
3
in Courtroom 4 on February 1, 2013, pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). Should the papers raise
4
issues on which the Court believes oral argument would be helpful, the hearing will be reset.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
Dated:
8
December 21, 2012
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
9
10
b2e55c0d
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION REGARDING DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT REVISED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD - 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?