DeVon v. Diaz et al
Filing
42
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 4/5/2012 requiring plaintiff to file opposition or statement of non-opposition to 41 MOTION to DISMISS filed by Carlson, T. Atkins. Filing Deadline: 5/8/2012. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ALAN DeVON,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
1:07-cv-01727-AWI-GSA-PC
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS AKIN AND
CARLSON’S MOTION TO DISMISS WITHIN
THIRTY DAYS
v.
DIAZ, et al.,
15
Defendants.
(Doc. 41.)
/
16
17
On October 18, 2011, defendants Akin and Carlson ("Defendants") filed a motion to dismiss.
18
(Doc. 41.) Plaintiff was required to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion
19
within twenty-one days, but has not done so. Local Rule 230(l).
20
Local Rule 230(l) provides that the failure to oppose a motion "may be deemed a waiver
21
of any opposition to the granting of the motion..." The court will deem any failure to oppose
22
Defendants’ motion to dismiss as a waiver, and recommend that the motion be granted on that
23
basis.
24
Failure to follow a district court's local rules is a proper grounds for dismissal. U.S. v.
25
Warren, 601 F.2d 471, 474 (9th Cir. 1979). Thus, a court may dismiss an action for plaintiff's
26
failure to oppose a motion to dismiss, where the applicable local rule determines that failure to
27
oppose a motion will be deemed a waiver of opposition. See Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52 (9th
28
Cir. 1995), cert. denied 516 U.S. 838 (1995) (dismissal upheld even where plaintiff contends he
1
1
did not receive motion to dismiss, where plaintiff had adequate notice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.
2
P. 5(b), and time to file opposition); cf. Marshall v. Gates, 44 F.3d 722, 725 (9th Cir. 1995);
3
Henry v. Gill Industries, Inc., 983 F.2d 943, 949-50 (9th Cir. 1993) (motion for summary
4
judgment cannot be granted simply as a sanction for a local rules violation, without an
5
appropriate exercise of discretion).
6
Accordingly, within thirty days of the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall file an
7
opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants. If
8
Plaintiff fails to comply with this order, the Court will deem the failure to respond as a waiver,
9
and recommend that the motion be granted on that basis.
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
Dated:
6i0kij
April 5, 2012
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?