DeVon v. Diaz et al

Filing 47

ORDER DIRECTING Clerk to Re-Serve [36-1] Second Informational Order with RAND NOTICE on Plaintiff signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/9/2012. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ALAN DeVON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) DIAZ, et al., ) ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) 1:07-cv-01727-AWI-GSA-PC ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO RESERVE SECOND INFORMATIONAL ORDER WITH RAND NOTICE ON PLAINTIFF (Doc. 36-1.) 17 Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. 18 On October 18, 2011, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss this action for Plaintiff's failure to exhaust 19 administrative remedies. (Doc. 41.) By this motion, Defendants seek to dismiss this action in its 20 entirety. 21 On July 19, 2011, the Court issued the Second Informational Order, Motion to Dismiss Notice, 22 and Summary Judgment Notice in this action, providing Plaintiff with notice pursuant to Rand v. 23 Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998), advising Plaintiff of his rights and responsibilities to oppose a 24 motion to dismiss such as that filed by Defendants in this action. (Doc. 36-1.) At this juncture, Plaintiff 25 shall be provided with another copy of the Order/Notice. Woods v. Carey, No. 09-15548, 09-16113, 26 2012 WL 2626912 (9th Cir. July 6, 2012). Plaintiff is advised to immediately review the Order/Notice 27 in its entirety for information pertaining to his opposition to Defendants' pending motion to dismiss. 28 /// 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve another copy of the Second 2 Informational Order, Motion to Dismiss Notice and Summary Judgment Notice (Doc. 36-1) upon 3 Plaintiff, for his review. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: 6i0kij 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 July 9, 2012 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?