Carter v. Munoz et al

Filing 38

ORDER Striking Unsigned Motion To Compel, And Granting Plaintiff Thirty Days Within Which To File Signed Motion (Doc. 36 ) ORDER Disregarding Motion For Status (Doc. 37 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 10/16/2009. (Scrivner, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 / 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 This is civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by Plaintiff Desha M. Carter, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. This action is proceeding against Defendants Munoz, Paz, Parra, and Silva for violation of the Eighth Amendment arising from the conditions Plaintiff was subjected to in the management cell, against Defendant Munoz for violation of the Due Process Clause arising from Plaintiff's placement in the management cell, and against Defendant Munoz for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to compel, filed July 14, 2009. Defendants did not file a response. Plaintiff failed to sign his motion to compel. The Court cannot consider unsigned documents. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a); Local Rule 7-131. Accordingly, Plaintiff's unsigned motion to compel is HEREBY STRICKEN from the record, and Plaintiff has thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order within which to file a signed motion. 1 v. C. MUNOZ, et al., (Doc. 36) Defendants. ORDER DISREGARDING MOTION FOR STATUS (Doc. 37) DESHA M. CARTER, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:07-cv-01736-SMS PC ORDER STRIKING UNSIGNED MOTION TO COMPEL, AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF THIRTY DAYS WITHIN WHICH TO FILE SIGNED MOTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff's motion regarding the status of his pending motion to compel, filed October 14, 2009, is HEREBY DISREGARDED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: i0d3h8 October 16, 2009 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?