Carter v. Munoz et al
Filing
57
ORDER STRIKING 56 Plaintiff's Surreply signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 2/9/2010. (Jessen, A)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: i0d3h8 February 9, 2010 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE On February 8, 2010, Plaintiff Desha M. Carter filed a surreply. Neither the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure nor the Local Rules provide for the filing of a surreply as a matter of right and the Court did not order that one be filed. Accordingly, the surreply is HEREBY ORDERED STRICKEN from the record. Defendants' motion for summary judgment was deemed submitted upon the filing of the reply, and the Court will addressed the motion in due course. Local Rule 230(l). v. C. MUNOZ, et al., Defendants. / DESHA M. CARTER, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:07-cv-01736-SMS PC ORDER STRIKING SURREPLY (Doc. 56)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
