Williams v. California Department of Corrections et al

Filing 11

**VACATED Pursuant to 18 Order** FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/6/09: Recommending that this action be DISMISSED, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff's failure to state any claims upon which relief may be granted under section 1983; and the Clerk be DIRECTED to close this case as to 1 Complaint filed by Clifford J. Williams. (Objections to F&R due by 8/10/2009) (Hellings, J)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Defendants. 14 / 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. Plaintiff Clifford J. Williams ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on December 20, 2007. (Doc. 1.) On May 7, 2009, the undersigned dismissed Plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and gave Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint within thirty days. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). (Doc.10.) To date, Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the Court's order. As a result, there is no pleading on file which sets forth any claims upon which relief may be granted under section 1983. Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the undersigned HEREBY RECOMMENDS that: 1. This action be DISMISSED, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff's failure to state any claims upon which relief may be granted under section 1983; and The Clerk be DIRECTED to close this case. 1 OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., CLIFFORD J. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, 1:07-cv-01855-LJO-GSA-PC FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED (Doc. 1.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6i0kij 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within thirty (30) days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, Plaintiff may file written objections with the Court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:

July 6, 2009

/s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2