De Anda v. Rapozo et al

Filing 30

ORDER To SHOW CAUSE Re Defendant Twin Cities Hospital's Failure To Respond To The Court's Order Re Consent Or Request For Reassignment, Response Due In 30 Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 9/2/2009. Show Cause Response due by 10/7/2009. (Scrivner, E)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On July 7, 2009, the court issued an Order Re Consent or Request for Reassignment, requiring defendant Twin Cities Hospital to complete and return the form within thirty (30) days, indicating either consent to the jurisdiction of the U.S. Magistrate Judge, or requesting that the case be reassigned to a U.S. District Judge. The thirty (30)-day period has now expired, and defendant has not returned the form, or otherwise responded to the court's order. Local Rule 11-110 provides that "failure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Local Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for the imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court." Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that within 30 days from the date of service of this order, defendant Twin Cities Hospital shall complete and return the Order Re Consent or Request for Reassignment, a copy of which is attached hereto, or show cause, in -1vs. J. RAPOSO, et al., Defendants. RESPONSE DUE IN 30 DAYS ________________________________/ JUAN CORDERO DE ANDA, Plaintiff, 1:07-cv-1895 AWI DLB (PC) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DEFENDANT TWIN CITIES HOSPITAL'S FAILURE TO RESPOND TO THE COURT'S ORDER RE CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

writing, why sanctions should not be imposed for defendant's failure to obey a court order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: d274kd

September 2, 2009

/s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

-2-