De Anda v. Rapozo et al
Filing
49
ORDER Requiring Plaintiff To Respond To Motions For Summary Judgment (Docs. 33 , 38 , 44 ), Response Due Within 30 Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 2/16/2010. (Response Deadline: 3/22/2010) (Scrivner, E)
1 2 3 4 5 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Plaintiff Juan Cordero De Anda ("Plaintiff") is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding against Defendants J. Rapozo, Sanchez, and Twin Cities Hospital. On September 3, 2009, Defendant Sanchez filed a motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 33.) On November 19, 2009, Defendant Twin Cities Hospital filed a motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 38.) On January 6, 2010, Defendant J. Rapozo filed a motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 44.) As of the date of this order, Plaintiff has not filed an opposition or statement of non-opposition to any of the motions, as required by the Court's Local Rule 230(l). Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS Plaintiff to respond to Defendants' motions for summary judgment within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action for failure to obey a court order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 77e0d6 v. J. RAPOZO, et al., Defendants. / JUAN CORDERO DE ANDA, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:07-cv-01895-DLB (PC) ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docs. 33, 38, 44) RESPONSE DUE WITHIN 30 DAYS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
February 16, 2010
/s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?