Spence v. People of The State of California

Filing 35

ORDER Adopting 33 Supplemental Findings and Recommendations; ORDER DENYING Respondent's 20 Motion to Dismiss; ORDER Directing Respondent to File an Answer to Petition for 1 Writ of Habeas Corpus signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 9/21/2009. ( Answer to Petition Deadline: 11/23/2009)(Figueroa, O)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 19 The Magistrate Judge issued a Supplemental Findings and Recommendation on July 6, 2009, 20 that recommended that Respondent's motion to dismiss be denied. The Findings and 21 Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed 22 within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the order. No objections were filed within that time. 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de 24 novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that the 25 Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis. 26 27 28
U . S . D i s t r ic t C o u r t E. D . C a lifo r n ia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EDDIE C. SPENCE, Petitioner,

v.

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

1:08-cv-00045 AWI YNP [DLB] (HC) ORDER ADOPTING SUPPLEMENTAL FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION [Doc. #33] ORDER DENYING RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS [Doc. #20] ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO FILE AN ANSWER TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
U . S . D i s t r ic t C o u r t E. D . C a lifo r n ia

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. 2. 3. The Findings and Recommendation issued July 6, 2009, is ADOPTED IN FULL; Respondent's motion to dismiss is DENIED; Respondent is DIRECTED to file an answer to the petition for writ of habeas corpus within sixty (60) days.1

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 0m8i78 September 21, 2009 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

For further information regarding the filing of an answer or traverse, please refer to this Court's June 2, 2008, Order Requiring Respondent to File Responsive Pleading. (Doc. #15). 2

1