Cranford v. Salber et al

Filing 41

ORDER DENYING 39 Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default Judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/6/2011. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ARCHIE CRANFORD, 12 Plaintiff, 13 Case No. 1:08-cv-00063 JLT (PC) ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT vs. (Doc. 39) 14 15 16 DIANE SALBER, et al., Defendant. / 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s October 4, 2011 motion for entry 19 of default judgment. (Doc. 39). Therein, Plaintiff argues that default judgment should be entered against 20 Defendants for their failure to plead or otherwise defend the action. (Id.) On October 6, 2011, 21 Defendants filed their reply to Plaintiff’s request. (Doc. 40). 22 Plaintiff’s motion fails to explain why entry of default against Defendants would be appropriate 23 at this time. Defendants’ opposition suggests that Plaintiff may have filed his current motion in response 24 to Defendants’ inability to complete the deposition of Plaintiff. (Doc. 40). However, as Defendants 25 explain, they intend to proceed in the action without the benefit of Plaintiff’s deposition. In addition, 26 the Court notes that on January 14, 2011, Defendants timely filed an answer to Plaintiff’s complaint. 27 (Doc. 23). Therefore, default judgment is not appropriate at this time. 28 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s October 4, 2011 motion for default 1 1 judgment (Doc. 39) is DENIED. 2 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 Dated: October 6, 2011 9j7khi /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?