Jones et al v. California Department of Corrections et al
Filing
99
ORDER Requiring Plaintiff To Submit Additional Briefing (Document 98 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 2/10/2015.(Filing Deadline: 2/20/2015) (Fahrney, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MARK JONES,
12
Plaintiff,
13
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO
SUBMIT ADDITIONAL BRIEFING
v.
14
Case No. 1:08cv-00069-LJO-DLB PC
COUCH,
(Document 98)
15
Defendant.
16
Plaintiff Mark Jones (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
17
18
pauperis in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Pursuant to the Ninth Circuit’s remand, the Court set an evidentiary hearing on the issue of
19
20
exhaustion for December 8, 2014. However, Plaintiff was unable to attend the hearing because of a
21
medical issue.
After a December 18, 2014, status conference, the evidentiary hearing was set for March 2,
22
23
24
2015.
On February 5, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion for an extension of time. He states that during
25
rehousing, many of his legal documents were lost. Plaintiff requests a thirty-day extension of the
26
hearing date so that he can be transferred back to CSP-Sacramento, where he has copies of
27
documents, or get his legal property delivered to Corcoran State Prison.
28
1
1
Given Plaintiff’s position on the exhaustion issue, it seems that only his testimony is
2
necessary at the hearing. However, the Court will permit Plaintiff an opportunity to explain why he
3
needs documentary evidence. Plaintiff SHALL provide this explanation to the Court within ten (10)
4
days of the date of service of this order. The Court will rule on Plaintiff’s request for an extension
5
after evaluating Plaintiff’s response.
6
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
February 10, 2015
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?