Monclova-Chavez v. McEachern et al

Filing 165

ORDER vacating 156 ORDER and WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM to TRANSPORT Maximiliano Monclova Chavez signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 7/19/2013. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MAXIMILLIAN MONCLOVA-CHAVEZ, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. ERIC McEACHERN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:08-cv-00076-AWI-BAM ORDER VACATING JULY 10, 2013 ORDER & WRIT OF HEABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM TO TRANSPORT MAXIMILIANO MONCLOVA CHAVEZ, 1306300354, PLAINTIFF WITNESS (ECF No. 156) Plaintiff Maximilian Monclova-Chavez is a federal prisoner proceeding in this civil rights 18 action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 19 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999 (1971). On July10, 2013, the Court issued an Order & Writ of Habeas Corpus 20 ad Testificandum commanding the United States Marshal to transport Plaintiff from the San 21 Bernardino Central Detention Center and produce him to testify in this Court on July 30, 2013. 22 On July 19, 2013, Plaintiff’s counsel filed a notice of acceptance of offer of judgment from 23 Defendants White and Miller. (ECF No. 163.) Based on the notice, the Court vacated the jury trial set 24 for July 30, 2013. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 25 1. The Order & Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issued on July 10, 2013, 26 commanding the production of Plaintiff Maximiliano Monclova Chavez is VACATED; 27 and 28 1 2. The Clerk’s Office shall serve courtesy copies of this order on the San Bernardino Central 1 Detention Center and on the United States Marshal-Central District of California. 2 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: July 19, 2013 7 8 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 0m8i788 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?