Benavente v. Hedgpeth

Filing 60

ORDER Regarding Petitioner's 58 Motion for Resentencing; ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Regarding Order Granting Petition as to Ground One signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 05/07/2012. Show Cause Response due by 6/11/2012. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 JAIME BENAVENTE, JR., 1:08-CV-00085 GSA HC 12 Petitioner, 13 14 ORDER REGARDING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR RESENTENCING [Doc. #58] v. ANTHONY HEDGPETH, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING ORDER GRANTING PETITION AS TO GROUND ONE [Doc. #47] Respondents. ___________________________________/ THIRTY DAY DEADLINE 15 16 17 18 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 20 On May 26, 2010, Magistrate Judge John M. Dixon issued an order granting the petition for 21 writ of habeas corpus as to Ground One. Magistrate Judge Dixon ordered the case remanded to the 22 Tulare County Superior Court and set a deadline of sixty days for resentencing without the gang 23 enhancement as to Count Two. 24 On April 17, 2012, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal denied the appeal. On May 3, 2012, 25 Petitioner filed a motion requesting the matter be remanded to the Tulare County Superior Court for 26 resentencing. As noted above, however, resentencing was ordered to occur within sixty days of the 27 date of the May 26, 2010, order. 28 U .S. D istrict C ourt E. D . C alifornia cd 1 1 Accordingly, Respondent is ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE within thirty (30) days of the date 2 of service of this Order whether resentencing has occurred in this matter, and if not, why it has not 3 occurred. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6i0kij /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE cd 2 6 Dated: May 7, 2012 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 U .S. D istrict C ourt E. D . C alifornia

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?