Singleton v. Hedgepath et al
ORDER Denying 111 Request for Appointment of Expert Witness, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 3/14/11. (Verduzco, M)
(PC) Singleton v. Hedgepath et al
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 6i0kij vs. A. HEDGEPATH, et al., ( Doc. 111.) Defendants. ________________________________/ On November 19, 2010, Plaintiff filed a request for appointment of an expert witness, and on March 7, 2011, Plaintiff filed a declaration in support of the request. (Docs. 111, 152.) The expenditure of public funds on behalf of an indigent litigant is proper only when authorized by Congress. See Tedder v. Odel, 890 F.2d 210 (9th Cir. 1989) (citations omitted). The in forma pauperis statute does not authorize the expenditure of public funds for the purpose sought by Plaintiff in the instant request. Accordingly, Plaintiff's request for the appointment of an expert witness is HEREBY DENIED. KELVIN SINGLETON, Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF EXPERT WITNESS 1:08-cv-00095-AWI-GSA-PC IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
March 14, 2011
/s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?