Singleton v. Hedgepath et al
Filing
239
ORDER Quashing Deposition Subpoenas signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 08/25/2015. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KELVIN X. SINGLETON,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
1:08-cv-00095-AWI-GSA-PC
ORDER QUASHING DEPOSITION
SUBPOENAS
vs.
S. LOPEZ, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
18
This civil rights action, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983, proceeds on the Second
19
Amended Complaint filed by state prisoner Kelvin X. Singleton (APlaintiff@) on February 12,
20
2009, against defendants Chief Medical Officer (CMO) A. Youssef; S. Lopez, M.D.; J.
21
Akanno, M.D.; S. Qamar, M.D.; Dr. Vasquez, M.D.; Registered Nurse II (RN) Ali; and RN
22
Wright-Pearson (“Defendants”), on Plaintiff’s claims for deliberate indifference to his serious
23
medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment, for delay in providing effective treatment
24
for Plaintiff’s back pain, and failure to respond to Plaintiff’s eye pain and swelling. (Doc. 26.)
25
This case is presently in the discovery phase.
26
On August 20, 2015, the parties took part in a telephonic discovery conference with
27
Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin regarding deposition subpoenas served by Plaintiff on Dr.
28
Steven Yaplee, Dr. Marshall Lewis and Dr. Ashok Parmar. Attorney Patrick C. Justman
1
1
appeared telephonically on behalf of Plaintiff. Deputy Attorney General William J. Douglas
2
appeared telephonically on behalf of Defendants.
3
Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin, having read the parties’ Joint Statement of Discovery
4
Dispute, and having heard the oral arguments of counsel, held that the court’s order of April,
5
24, 2015 (ECF No. 233) did not give Plaintiff leave to serve deposition subpoenas. Therefore,
6
the deposition subpoenas served on Dr. Steven Yaplee, Dr. Marshall Lewis and Dr. Ashok
7
Parmar shall be quashed.
8
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
9
1.
10
11
The deposition subpoenas served by Plaintiff on Dr. Steven Yaplee, Dr.
Marshall Lewis and Dr. Ashok Parmar are QUASHED; and
2.
This order does not affect Plaintiff’s documents subpoenas to the foregoing
12
doctors, or the parties’ ability to conduct expert witness depositions as provided by Federal
13
Code of Civil Procedure section 26(b)(4)(A).
14
15
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
August 25, 2015
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?