Singleton v. Hedgepath et al
Filing
271
ORDER Vacating Amended Order and Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum, Issued on March 3, 2016, to Transport Kelvin X. Singleton, CDCR #H-86959, and his Legal Property signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 03/11/2016. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KELVIN X. SINGLETON,
12
13
14
15
16
17
Plaintiff,
v.
A. HEDGEPATH, et al.,
Defendants.
1:08-cv-00095-EPG (PC)
ORDER VACATING AMENDED ORDER
AND WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD
TESTIFICANDUM, ISSUED ON MARCH 3,
2016, TO TRANSPORT KELVIN X.
SINGLETON, CDCR #H-86959, AND HIS
LEGAL PROPERTY
(ECF No. 269.)
KELVIN X. SINGLETON
CDCR #H-86959
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
On March 3, 2016, the Court issued an amended order and Writ of Habeas Corpus ad
Testificandum to transport Plaintiff Kelvin X. Singleton and his legal property, commanding
the Warden of Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility to produce California prisoner Kelvin
X. Singleton, CDCR #H-86959, to attend a settlement conference in this action before
Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman, on March 29, 2016 at 1:30 p.m., in Courtroom #25 at the
United States District Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814. (ECF No. 269.)
Instead of appearing in person at the settlement conference, Plaintiff shall appear
telephonically. Therefore, it is not necessary for Plaintiff to be transported to Court for the
settlement conference. By separate order, the Court shall notify the parties of this change.
1
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Court's amended order and
2
Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issued on March 3, 2016,
3
commanding the production of inmate Kelvin X. Singleton and his legal
4
property, BE HEREBY VACATED.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated:
March 11, 2016
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?