Dynes v. Medina, et al

Filing 90

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 2/23/2010 striking 84 Motion and disregarding 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 Motions. (Lundstrom, T)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 Defendants. 14 15 On February 23, 2010, Plaintiff filed five documents entitled motions. The filings are hereby 16 resolved as follows. 17 Plaintiff's statement that he would like to settle out of court for $3,500.00 is STRICKEN 18 from the record. (Doc. 84.) The Court has already twice addressed this issue. (Docs. 50, 77.) 19 Plaintiff's replies to Defendants' opposition to Plaintiff's response to the Court's order to 20 show cause are DISREGARDED. (Docs. 85, 87, 88.) The Court has already issued an order 21 discharging the order to show cause, and confirming this matter for trial on April 14, 2010. (Doc. 22 76.) 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 1 / v. JUAN MEDINA and DAVID WILLIAMS, JOHN RAY DYNES, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:08-cv-00136-GSA PC ORDER STRIKING FILING (Doc. 84) ORDER DISREGARDING FILINGS (Docs. 85-88)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Plaintiff's motion for an order seeking the production of his central file and for jury trial in this matter is DISREGARDED. (Doc. 86.) The Court has already addressed these issues. (Docs. 76, 77.)

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 6i0kij

February 23, 2010

/s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2