Cade v. State of California et al

Filing 14

ORDER DISMISSING Action, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 12/23/2009. CASE CLOSED. (Sondheim, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. On September 23, 2009, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g), and Plaintiff be directed to pay the filing fee in full. On October 29, 2009, the findings and recommendations were adopted in full, denying Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis and directing Plaintiff to pay the $350 filing fee, in full, within thirty days. Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee. Plaintiff has been denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Therefore, Plaintiff may not proceed in forma pauperis unless he has alleged facts indicating that he is in imminent danger of serious injury. Plaintiff has not done so in this case. The October 29, 2009, order directing Plaintiff to pay the filing fee LAFEYETTE CADE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CDCR, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) 1:08 CV 00183 AWI YNP GSA (PC) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 cautioned Plaintiff that his failure to do so would result in dismissal of this action. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Local Rule 11-110 for failure to pay the filing fee. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 0m8i78 December 23, 2009 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?