Cazares v. Yates

Filing 36

ORDER EXTENDING Discovery and Scheduling Order Issued November 22, 2013, to Defendant Nassif Tarek signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/5/2013. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

SIMON CAZARES,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
TAREK NASSIF, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

a serious medical need in violation of the Eighth Amendment.
On May 13, 2013, Defendant Nassif filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to
exhaust the administrative remedies. The motion was denied on November 20, 2013.
On November 12, 2013, Defendant Coleman filed an answer to the complaint, and a discovery

23
24

[ECF Nos. 34, 35]

This action is proceeding against Defendants Nassif and Coleman for deliberate indifference to

21
22

ORDER EXTENDING DISCOVERY AND
SCHEDULING ORDER ISSUED NOVEMBER 22,
2013, TO DEFENDANT NASSIF TAREK

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

19
20

Case No.: 1:08-cv-00232-AWI-SAB (PC)

Plaintiff Simon Cazares is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action

17
18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

and scheduling order was issued on November 22, 2013.
On December 4, 2013, Defendant Nassif filed an answer to the complaint.

25
26

///

27

///

28

///
1

1

In light of the fact that the discovery and scheduling order was issued prior to the filing of

2

Defendant Nassif’s answer, Defendant Nassif is advised that the discovery and scheduling order issued

3

November 20, 2013, is extended and made applicable to him as well as Defendant Coleman.

4
5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

December 5, 2013
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2