Cazares v. Yates

Filing 41

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, GRANTING Summary Judgment Motion in Favor of Defendant Tarek Nassif, and Enter Judgment in Favor of Defendant Nassif Only 40 , signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 9/4/14. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SIMON CAZARES, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. NASSIF TAREK, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Case No.: 1:08-cv-00232-AWI-SAB (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT TAREK NASSIF, AND ENTER JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT NASSIF ONLY [ECF No. 40] Plaintiff Simon Cazares is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 27, 2014, Defendant Tarek Nassif filed a motion for summary judgment. On May 19 20 21, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation recommending to grant 21 summary judgment in favor of Defendant Tarek Nassif. The Findings and Recommendation contained 22 notice that objections were to filed within twenty days. No objections have been filed. 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de 24 novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and 25 Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 27 1. 28 The Findings and Recommendations, filed on May 21, 2014, is adopted in full; /// 1 1 2. Defendant Nassif’s motion for summary is GRANTED; and 2 3. Judgment shall be entered in favor of Defendant Nassif only. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: September 4, 2014 6 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?