Morgan v. Tilton et al

Filing 36

ORDER ADOPTING 35 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 22 Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 6/2/2010. (Bradley, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 vs. TILTON, et al., Defendants. _____________________________/ Kelly Morgan ("plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. On April 2, 2010, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunctive relief, filed on October 13, 2009, be denied. Plaintiff was granted thirty days in which to file objections to the findings and recommendations. To date, plaintiff has not filed objections or otherwise responded to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ' 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 73305, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. 1 KELLY MORGAN, Plaintiff, 1:08-cv-00233-OWW-GSA-PC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 35.) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF (Doc. 22.) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DENIED. Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that: 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on April 2, 2010, are adopted in full; and 2. Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunctive relief, filed on October 13, 2009, is IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 2, 2010 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?