Morgan v. Tilton et al

Filing 66

ORDER Adopting 63 Findings and Recommendations; ORDER Denying 54 Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/28/12. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KELLY MORGAN, 12 13 14 15 16 17 Plaintiff, vs. TILTON, et al., Defendants. 1:08-cv-00233-LJO-GSA-PC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 63.) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF (Doc. 54.) _____________________________/ Kelly Morgan (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant 19 to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On July 16, 2012, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that Plaintiff's 21 motion for preliminary injunctive relief, filed on December 8, 2011, be denied. Plaintiff was 22 provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings and recommendations within thirty days. 23 To date, Plaintiff has not filed objections or otherwise responded to the findings and 24 recommendations. 25 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ' 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this 26 Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 27 Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. 28 1 1 Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that: 2 1. 3 The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on July 16, 2012, are adopted in full; and 4 2. 5 Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief, filed on December 8, 2011, is DENIED. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: b9ed48 August 28, 2012 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?