Morgan v. Tilton et al
Filing
66
ORDER Adopting 63 Findings and Recommendations; ORDER Denying 54 Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/28/12. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KELLY MORGAN,
12
13
14
15
16
17
Plaintiff,
vs.
TILTON, et al.,
Defendants.
1:08-cv-00233-LJO-GSA-PC
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATIONS
(Doc. 63.)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S
MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
(Doc. 54.)
_____________________________/
Kelly Morgan (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action
18
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant
19
to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On July 16, 2012, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that Plaintiff's
21
motion for preliminary injunctive relief, filed on December 8, 2011, be denied. Plaintiff was
22
provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings and recommendations within thirty days.
23
To date, Plaintiff has not filed objections or otherwise responded to the findings and
24
recommendations.
25
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ' 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this
26
Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
27
Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.
28
1
1
Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:
2
1.
3
The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on July 16, 2012,
are adopted in full; and
4
2.
5
Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief, filed on December 8, 2011, is
DENIED.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
Dated:
b9ed48
August 28, 2012
/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?