Morgan v. Tilton et al

Filing 68

ORDER adopting 67 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and denying 57 Motion to Dismiss signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/28/2012. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KELLY MORGAN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 vs. TILTON, et al., 15 16 Defendants. 1:08-cv-00233-LJO-GSA-PC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 67.) ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 57.) _____________________________/ 17 Kelly Morgan (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant 19 to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On September 5, 2012, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that 21 Defendant's motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust be denied. (Doc. 67.) The parties were 22 provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings and recommendations within twenty days. 23 To date, no objections have been filed. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ' 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this 24 25 Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. 27 /// 28 1 1 Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that: 2 1. 3 The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on September 5, 2012, are adopted in full; and 4 2. Defendant's motion to dismiss, filed on December 22, 2011, is DENIED. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: 66h44d September 28, 2012 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?