Corona v. Knowles et al

Filing 102

PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 12/6/2011. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672 Attorney General of California MONICA N. ANDERSON, State Bar No. 182970 Supervising Deputy Attorney General KELLI M. HAMMOND, State Bar No. 217485 Deputy Attorney General 1300 I Street, Suite 125 P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 Telephone: (916) 322-4638 Fax: (916) 324-5205 E-mail: Kelli.Hammond@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendants Chrones, Knowles, Harrington and Frauenheim 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRESNO DIVISION 11 12 13 OSCAR CRUZ, 14 1:08-CV-00237-LJO-DLB (PC) Plaintiff, PROTECTIVE ORDER 15 v. 16 MIKE KNOWLES, et al., 17 Defendants. 18 19 IT IS STIPULATED BY THE PARTIES, BY AND THROUGH THEIR 20 21 RESPECTIVE COUNSEL, AND ORDERED BY THE COURT AS FOLLOWS: 22 A. CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL SUBJECT TO THIS PROTECTIVE ORDER 23 Plaintiffs seek the production of documents, files, memoranda, letters, electronic mail, 24 written reports, and other records pertaining to the denial of privileges to Southern Hispanic 25 inmates during the lockdowns or modified programs at Kern Valley State Prison, as well as 26 documents, files, memoranda, letters, written reports, and other records contained in the 27 confidential portions of inmates’ central files (“Document” or “Documents”). 28 /// 1 Protective Order (1:08-CV-00237-LJO-DLB (PC)) 1 These Documents may contain information that has been deemed confidential by the 2 California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Release of any such 3 Documents may jeopardize the safety and security of the institution, as well as inmates and 4 correctional personnel. Therefore, Defendants shall be entitled to designate in good faith which 5 of the Documents in its production are confidential. The criteria for such a designation shall be 6 whether the Document is of an inflammatory, sensitive, and confidential nature, such that the 7 release of this information is inappropriate. 8 With respect to any such Documents, the parties stipulate to the following procedure : (1) 9 Before CDCR releases these Documents to Plaintiffs’ counsel, the parties will meet and confer to 10 determine whether they can agree that the records are likely to lead to the discovery of admissible 11 evidence, and will be produced subject to the conditions set forth below; (2) if the parties do not 12 agree, then the documents in question will be presented to the Court for in camera review; and (3) 13 documents ordered to be produced after in camera review will be subject to the conditions of this 14 protective order as set forth below. 15 B. CONDITIONS FOR RELEASE OF CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS 16 1. Defendants shall indicate which Documents in its production it claims are 17 confidential by producing such Documents on pink or lilac-colored paper, by stamping them as 18 “confidential” on their face, or by other mutually agreeable means. If Defendants do not indicate 19 that a particular Document is confidential at the time it is produced, it will be presumed not 20 confidential, without prejudice to Defendants’ right to assert confidentiality at a later time. 21 22 2. Unless the Court Orders otherwise, Confidential Documents and the information contained therein may be disclosed only to the following persons: 23 a. Counsel of record; 24 b. Paralegal, stenographic, clerical, and secretarial personnel employed by counsel 25 of record; 26 c. 27 28 Court personnel, stenographic reporters, and videographers engaged in such proceedings that are incidental to preparation for the trial in this action; /// 2 Protective Order (1:08-CV-00237-LJO-DLB (PC)) 1 d. 2 Any outside expert or consultant retained by the parties for purposes of this litigation; 3 e. Witnesses to whom the Documents and the information contained in the 4 Documents may be disclosed during, or in preparation for, a deposition taken in 5 this matter, or otherwise during the preparation for trial and during trial, 6 provided that the witness may not leave any deposition with copies of any of 7 the confidential Documents, and shall be informed or and shall agree to be 8 bound by the terms of this order; 9 3. Plaintiff’s counsel is prohibited from disclosing any confidential Documents or 10 information to Mr. Santana and Maria Corona, any inmate presently or previously in the custody 11 of the CDCR, or any relative of an inmate presently or previously in the custody of the CDCR. 12 4. Plaintiff’s counsel, including paralegal, stenographic, clerical, and secretarial 13 personnel employed by Plaintiff’s counsel of record shall not make copies of the confidential 14 Documents except as necessary for purposes of this litigation, Corona v. Knowles, USDC, 15 Eastern District of California, 1:08-cv-00237 LJO DLB (PC), including appeals. 16 5. Each person to whom disclosure of confidential Documents and the information 17 contained therein is made shall, prior to the time of disclosure, be provided a copy of this order 18 and shall agree in writing that he or she has read this order, understands the provisions and 19 conditions, and agrees to be bound by its provisions, and consent to be subject to the jurisdiction 20 of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California with respect to any 21 proceeding relating to the enforcement of this order, including, without limitation, any proceeding 22 for contempt. 23 24 6. At the conclusion of this litigation, including appeals, all confidential Documents, including copies, shall be destroyed or returned to the Defendants. 25 7. When Plaintiffs’ counsel returns or destroys the confidential Documents, counsel 26 shall provide Defendants’ counsel with a declaration stating that all confidential Documents have 27 been returned or destroyed. 28 /// 3 Protective Order (1:08-CV-00237-LJO-DLB (PC)) 1 8. All confidential Documents and the information contained therein shall be used solely 2 in connection with this litigation, including appeals, and not for any other purpose, including 3 other litigation. 4 9. All confidential Documents that are filed with the Court shall be filed under seal, 5 labeled with a cover sheet bearing the case name along with the following statement: “This 6 document is subject to a protective order issued by the Court and shall not be examined or copied 7 except in compliance with that order.” Upon failure of the filing party to file confidential 8 Documents under seal, any party may request that the Court place the document under seal. 9 10. Nothing in this protective order is intended to prevent officials or employees of the 10 State of California, or other authorized government officials, from having access to confidential 11 Documents to which they would have access in the normal course of their official duties. 12 11. The provisions of this protective order are without prejudice to the right of any party: 13 a. 14 To apply to the Court for a further protective order relating to any confidential Documents or material, or relating to discovery in this litigation; 15 b. 16 To apply to the Court for an order removing the confidential material designation from any Documents; 17 c. 18 /// 19 /// 20 To object to a discovery request. /// 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 Protective Order (1:08-CV-00237-LJO-DLB (PC)) 1 12. This Protective Order shall be binding on the parties as of the date it is signed by the 2 parties. The provisions of this order shall remain in full force and effect until further order of this 3 Court. 4 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 5 December 6, 2011 _____/s/ Kelli M. Hammond__________ KELLI M. HAMMOND Attorney for Defendants December 2, 2011 _____/s/ Manu Pradhan_____________ MANU PRADHAN Attorney for Plaintiffs 6 7 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 Dated: /s/ Dennis December 6, 2011 12 L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 13 3b142a 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 Protective Order (1:08-CV-00237-LJO-DLB (PC))

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?