Corona v. Knowles et al

Filing 106

STIPULATION Regarding Expert Disclosures; and ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 12/14/2011. (Expert Disclosures to be made by 3/16/2012, This extension of time does not affect any other case deadlines set forth in the Courts most recent scheduling order.)(Gaumnitz, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6

BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP
WARREN E. GEORGE (SBN 53588)
MANU PRADHAN (SBN 253026)
Three Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, CA 94111-4067
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.393.2286
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Maria del Rosario
Corona and Andres Santana

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MARIA DEL ROSARIO CORONA, AS HEIR
OF THE ESTATE OF OSCAR CRUZ, et. al.,

12
Plaintiffs,
13
14

v.

Case No. 1:08-CV-00237-LJO-DLB
STIPULATION AND ORDER
REGARDING EXPERT
DISCLOSURES

KELLY HARRINGTON, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Case No. 1:08-CV-00237-LJO-DLB

STIPULATION REGARDING EXPERT DISCLOSURES; ORDER
A/74535557.1

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

1

STIPULATION

2

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 26(a)(2), the parties stipulate to an extension of the

3

deadline in the Scheduling Order issued on June 30, 2011 (Docket Item # 97) regarding expert

4

disclosures.

5

At the parties’ request, the Court originally ordered that expert disclosures should occur

6

two weeks after the close of fact discovery: fact discovery was to close on December 2 and

7

expert disclosures were to occur on December 16. (Docket Item ## 95, 97). Thereafter, the

8

Court approved the parties’ stipulation to extend fact discovery by three months, but did not

9

expressly order an extension of time related to expert disclosures. (Docket Item # 99). The

10

parties agree that the expert disclosure deadline should be made consistent with the new fact

11

discovery cut-off date. (Declaration of Manu Pradhan, ¶ 2). Further, Defendants’ document

12

production is not yet complete. (Id., ¶ 3.) Therefore, the parties propose that the Court extend

13

the date for expert disclosures to March 16, 2012, which is two weeks after the current fact

14

discovery cutoff. This extension of time does not affect any other case deadlines set forth in the

15

Court’s most recent scheduling order.

16

DATE: December 14, 2011

BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP

17
18
By:

19

/s/
Manu Pradhan
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

20
21

DATE: December 14, 2011

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA

22
23
By:

24

/s/
Kelli M. Hammond
Attorney for Defendants

25
26
1

Case No. 1:08-CV-00237-LJO-DLB

STIPULATION REGARDING EXPERT DISCLOSURES; ORDER
A/74535557.1

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

1

ORDER

2
3
4
5

GOOD CAUSE showing, IT IS SO ORDERED that the parties’ stipulation regarding
expert disclosures is approved.

6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8
9

/s/ Dennis

Dated: December 14, 2011

L. Beck_______

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2

Case No. 1:08-CV-00237-LJO-DLB

STIPULATION REGARDING EXPERT DISCLOSURES; ORDER
A/74535557.1

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com