Keel v. Hedgpeth et al

Filing 34

ORDER signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 4/20/2009 ADOPTING IN FULL 25 Findings and Recommendations and DISMISSING Defendants, B. Gricewich, A. Hedgpeth, S. Mash, C. Pefiffer, John Stokes W. Adams and Robert Ayers. (Lundstrom, T)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 A. HEDGPETH, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. The matter 16 was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local 17 Rule 72-302. 18 On March 18, 2009, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending 19 dismissal of certain defendants. Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections within 20 thirty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 21 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 22 73-305, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the 23 entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and 24 proper analysis. 25 Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that: 26 1 vs. ORDER RE: FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS (#25) ANTHONY KEEL, Plaintiff, 1: 08 CV 0242 OWW WMW PC IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 are dismissed.

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on March 18, 2009, are adopted in full; and 2. Defendants Hedgpeth, Gricewich, Pfeiffer, Adams, Stokes, Ayers and Mash

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 20, 2009 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2