Keel v. Hedgpeth et al

Filing 60

ORDER ADOPTING 59 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and DENYING Plaintiff's 49 Motion for Injunctive Relief, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 12/24/2009. (Sondheim, M)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 A. HEDGPETH, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. The matter 16 was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local 17 Rule 72-302. 18 On November 19, 2009, findings and recommendations were entered, 19 recommending dismissal of Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief. Plaintiff was provided an 20 opportunity to file objections within thirty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings 21 and recommendations. 22 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 23 73-305, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the 24 entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and 25 proper analysis. 26 1 vs. ORDER RE: FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS (#59) ANTHONY KEEL, Plaintiff, 1: 08 CV 00242 OWW YNP SMS (PC) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that: 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on November 19, 2009, are adopted in full; and 2. Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief filed on September 16, 2009, is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 24, 2009 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2