Keel v. Hedgpeth et al

Filing 69

ORDER ADOPTING 62 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 02/17/2010. Defendants C. Burrows and S. Wash terminated from action. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 A. HEDGPETH, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action. The matter 16 was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local 17 Rule 72-302. 18 On January 11, 2010, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending 19 dismissal of Defendants Burrows and Wash pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). 20 Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections within thirty days. On January 27, 2010, 21 Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 22 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 23 73-305, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the 24 entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and 25 proper analysis. 26 1 vs. ORDER RE: FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS (#62) ANTHONY KEEL, Plaintiff, 1: 08 CV 00242 OWW YNP SMS (PC) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that: 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on January 11, 2010, are adopted in full; and 2. Defendants Burrows and Wash are dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 17, 2010 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?