Hudson v. Brian et al

Filing 8

ORDER Assigning Action to Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder Pursuant to Appendix A(K)(4) of the Local Rules signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 7/16/2009. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3. 2. This is a civil rights action filed by Plaintiff, Michael W. Hudson, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Plaintiff consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction on March 7, 2008, and no other party has appeared in the action. Therefore, pursuant to Appendix A(k)(4) of the Local Rules of the Eastern District of California, this action shall be assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder to conduct any and all proceedings in the case until such time as reassignment to a District Judge is required. Local Rule Appendix A(k)(3). Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. This action is assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder for all purposes within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c); The Clerk of the Court is directed to assign this action in its entirety to Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder; and The new case number shall be 1:08-cv-00249-SMS PC, and all future pleadings and/or correspondence must be so numbered. The parties are advised that use of an incorrect case number, including initials, may result in a delay of documents 1 v. TERRY BRIAN, et al., (Doc. 8) Defendants. / MICHAEL W. HUDSON, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:08-cv-00249-OWW-SMS PC ORDER ASSIGNING ACTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE SANDRA M. SNYDER PURSUANT TO APPENDIX A(K)(4) OF THE LOCAL RULES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 being processed and copies thereof being correctly distributed and received by the appropriate judicial officer. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 16, 2009 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?