Broughton v. Yates et al

Filing 7

ORDER ADOPTING 6 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS and ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 5 Request for Remand, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 4/16/2009. (Sondheim, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendants. _____________________________/ Kendall Broughton ("plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. On February 18, 2009, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that plaintiff's request for this action to be remanded to the Fresno County Superior Court be denied. Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings and recommendations within thirty days. To date, plaintiff has not filed objections or otherwise responded to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ' 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 73305, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. 1 vs. JAMES YATES, et al., KENDALL BROUGHTON, Plaintiff, 1:08-cv-00283-AWI-SMS-PC ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 6.) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR REMAND (Doc. 5.) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that: 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on February 18, 2009, are ADOPTED in full; and 2. Plaintiff's request for remand, filed March 14, 2008, is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 0m8i78 April 16, 2009 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?