Mason v. Adams et al

Filing 16

{VACATED PURSUANT TO ORDER 19 } ORDER, signed by District Judge Cindy K. Jorgenson on 4/3/09: The Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this case, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim. The Clerk of Court must indicate on the docket that the dismissal counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 vs. Derral G. Adams, et al., Defendants. Glenn T. Mason, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 1-08-307-CKJ ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KM In a February 23, 2009 Order (Doc. #12), the Court dismissed Plaintiff's Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim. The Court gave Plaintiff 30 days to file a second amended complaint that cured the deficiencies identified in the Order and warned Plaintiff as follows: If Plaintiff fails to file a second amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal counts as a "strike' under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). More than 30 days have passed since the Court's February 23, 2009 Order was filed. Plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint. In accordance with the Court's February 23, 2009 Order, the Court will require the Clerk of Court to enter a judgment of dismissal of this case, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim. This dismissal counts as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Accordingly, .... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this case, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim. The Clerk of Court must indicate on the docket that the dismissal counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). DATED this 3rd day of April, 2009. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?