James v. Wilber et al

Filing 46

ORDER Granting 45 Request for Entry of Default and Denying Request for Default Judgment without Prejudice signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 11/30/2009. (Flores, E)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 RICKY W. JAMES, 9 Plaintiff, 10 v. 11 J. WILBER, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 / 14 15 Plaintiff Ricky James ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 16 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding against 17 defendants J. Wilbur, Siene, and Johnson ("Defendants") for violation of the Eighth Amendment. 18 This action was reassigned to the undersigned on October 8, 2009. (Doc. 41.) On November 16, 19 2009, Plaintiff filed a "request for entry of default with the clerk of court and simultaneously 20 move for contempt." (Doc. 45.) 21 All three defendants submitted waivers of service, and agreed to submit answers to 22 Plaintiff's complaint by June 12, 2009. (Docs. 24, 25, 26.) On May 4, 2009, Defendants filed a 23 motion to dismiss in part for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (Doc. 27.) 24 While this was a defense to the complaint, it is not a responsive pleading as defined in Rule 7(a). 25 Service of a motion postpones the filing of a responsive pleading to within ten (10) days after 26 27 28 1 (Doc. 45) ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AND DENYING REQUEST FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT WITHOUT PREJUDICE Case No. 1:08-cv-00351-DLB (PC)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

notice of the court's action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(4).1 The Court issued its order regarding Defendants' motion to dismiss on October 14, 2009, granting Defendants' motion to dismiss in part. (Doc. 42.) More than ten days have passed since the issuance of that order. As of the date of service of this order, Defendants have failed to file a responsive pleading. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a), default may be entered against a party that fails to plead or otherwise defend within the time set forth in the Federal Rules. Accordingly, Plaintiff's request for entry of default is granted. Plaintiff simultaneously moves for a finding of contempt against Defendants and seeks an award of damages. The Court construes this as a request for entry of default judgment.2 With regard to Plaintiff's request for default judgment, Plaintiff is advised that he may not simply demand that the Court order Defendants to pay the relief he requested in his complaint. Plaintiff must submit evidence in support of the amount of damages claimed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b). Because Plaintiff has submitted no evidence in support of this demand, the Court must deny Plaintiff's request for entry of default judgment without prejudice. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's request for entry of default against defendants J. Wilbur, Siene, and Johnson, filed November 16, 2009, is GRANTED; 2. The Clerk of the Court shall enter default against defendants J. Wilbur, Siene, and Johnson; and 3. Plaintiff's request for entry of default judgment is DENIED, without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 3b142a

November 30, 2009

/s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The language of s u b s e c t io n (A ) appears to limit the 10-day requirement to s it u a t io n s in which the Court " d e n ie s the motion or pos t p o n e s its dis p o s it io n until trial." Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(4)(A ). This provis io n logically e xt e n d s to s it u a t io n s in which a defendant's motion to dis mis s is granted in part, as was the outcome here. Plaintiff may be referring to 18 U.S.C. § 401, which s t a t e s that "[a] court of the United States s h a ll have p o we r to punis h by fine or impris o n me n t , or both, at its dis c re t io n , s u c h contempt of its authority." The Court d e c lin e s to exercis e s u c h power in this ins t a n c e as it is unneces s a ry .
2

1

2