Jacobs v. Woodford et al

Filing 83

ORDER DENYING 82 Request for the Court to Provide Plaintiff the Ninth Circuit Jury Instructions, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 01/02/2012. (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GEORGE E. JACOBS, IV, 12 Plaintiff, 13 JEANNE WOODFORD, et al., 15 ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR THE COURT TO PROVIDE PLAINTIFF THE NINTH CIRCUIT JURY INSTRUCTIONS v. 14 Case No. 1:08-cv-00369 JLT (PC) Defendants. (Doc. 82) 16 17 18 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights 19 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for the Court to 20 provide him a copy of the Ninth Circuit Model Jury Instructions. (Doc. 82) In support of this 21 motion, Plaintiff asserts that he does not have access to the model instructions. However, despite 22 this, the Court has neither the financial resources nor the obligation to provide copies of this two- 23 volume set. 24 Notably, the Court excused Plaintiff from the obligation to provide proposed jury 25 instructions and allowed that he could file them only if he wished. (Doc. 68 at 13) Thus, the 26 failure of the institution to maintain these model instructions does not impact Plaintiff’s access to 27 the Court. In any event, Plaintiff will be permitted to rely upon the CACI Jury Instructions— 28 which his institution does maintain--if he wishes to file proposed instruction. 1 1 ORDER Based upon the foregoing, Plaintiff’s request that the Court provide him copies of the 2 3 Ninth Circuit Model Jury Instructions is DENIED. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 6 January 2, 2013 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 DEAC_Signature-END: 9j7khijed 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?