Tater-Alexander v. Amerjan et al

Filing 113

STIPULATION To Amend Scheduling Order to Continue Expert Discovery Deadline; and ORDER, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 10/19/2010. (Expert discovery shall close on December 23, 2010. The subpoena requirements for expert depositions are waived by the parties and each party will voluntarily produce experts for deposition at agreed upon dates and times.) (Gaumnitz, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 M. Jeffery Kallis, SBN 190028 THE LAW FIRM OF KALLIS & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 333 W. San Carlos St., 8th Floor San Jose, CA 95110 Telephone: (408) 971-4655 Facsimile: (408) 971-4644 M J Kallis @Kallislaw.org Andrew V. Stearns, SBN 164849 Steven M. Berki, SBN 245426 Gaurav D. Sharma, SBN 269123 BUSTAMANTE, O'HARA & GAGLIASSO, P.C. 333 W. San Carlos St., 8th Floor San Jose, California 95110 Telephone: (408) 977-1911 Facsimile: (408) 977-0746 astearns@boglawyers.com Attorneys for Plaintiff MICHAEL TATER-ALEXANDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION MICHAEL TATER-ALEXANDER, Plaintiff, vs. LONNIE R. AMERJAN, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV-F-08-372 OWW SMS STIPULATION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER TO CONTINUE EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINE; and ORDER Complaint Filed: March 14, 2008 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES through their counsel of record as follows: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court's Scheduling Order expert discovery in this matter is currently set to close on October 29, 2010; WHEREAS, the parties, through counsel attended a telephone conference with Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on October 15, 2010. At said conference, the settlement conference scheduled for October 20, 2010 was continued to December 2, 2010. (ECF Doc. No. 110); Page 1 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 // WHEREAS, the parties believe it is in the interest of all parties to incur the cost and complete expert discovery after the settlement conference now set for December 2, 2010; WHEREAS, the parties agree to waive the subpoena requirements for expert depositions and will voluntarily produce experts for deposition at agreed upon dates and times THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and agree to the following modification to the Scheduling Order: 1. Expert discovery shall close on December 23, 2010. 2. The subpoena requirements for expert depositions are waived by the parties and each party will voluntarily produce experts for deposition at agreed upon dates and times. DATED: 10/15/10 THE LAW FIRM OF KALLIS & ASSOCIATES, P.C. By: /S/ M. JEFFERY KALLIS, attorneys for Plaintiff MICHAEL TATER-ALEXANDER DATED: 10/15/10 BUSTAMANTE, O'HARA & GAGLIASSO, PC By: /S/ ANDREW V. STEARNS STEVEN M. BERKI, attorneys for Plaintiff MICHAEL TATER-ALEXANDER DATED: 10/15/10 LAW OFFICES OF BENJAMIN RATLIFF By: /S/ BENJAMIN LEE RATLIFF, attorneys for Defendants, CITY OF CLOVIS, CLOVIS POLICE CORPORAL LONNIE R. AMERJAN, and CLOVIS POLICE OFFICER TINA STIRLING Page 2 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: 10/15/10 STAMMER, MCKNIGHT, BARNUM & BAILEY By: /S/ CAREY HUGH JOHNSON, attorneys for Defendants, COMMUNITY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER and NURSE MARILYN JO GREENE DATED: 10/15/10 MCCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP By: /S/ DANIEL LAWRENCE WAINWRIGHT, attorneys for Defendant, DR. THOMAS MANSFIELD FINAL PROCEDURES 15.1 AND 15.2 STATEMENT I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory above pursuant to Local Final Procedures 15.1 and 15.2. DATED: 10/15/10 By: BUSTAMANTE O'HARA GAGLIASSO, PC /S/ ANDREW V. STEARNS Attorneys for Plaintiff IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: DEAC_Sig nat ur e - END: October 19, 2010 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE emm0d64h Page 3 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?