Martin v. Woodford et al

Filing 106

ORDER Adopting 92 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDER GRANTING Defendant McGuiness's 54 Motion to Dismiss; ORDER DISMISSING Defendant McGuiness from this Action signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/29/2010. (Sant Agata, S)

(PC) Martin v. Woodford et al

Doc. 106

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Claudell Earl Martin ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 13, 2010, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendations which recommended that Defendant McGuinness's motion to dismiss be granted and Plaintiff's claim against McGuinness be dismissed as barred by the applicable statute of limitations. (Doc. #92.) The Findings and Recommendations were served on all parties and contained notice that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the date on which the Findings and Recommendations were served. Plaintiff filed objections on September 20, 2010. (Doc. #102.) In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 305, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. /// 1
Dockets.Justia.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CLAUDELL EARL MARTIN, Plaintiff, v.

CASE NO. 1:08-cv-00415-LJO-SKO PC O R D E R ADOPTING RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 92) FINDINGS AND

JEANNE S. WOODFORD, et al., Defendants. /

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: b9ed48

Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that: 1. 2. 3. The July 13, 2010 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED in full; Defendant McGuinness's motion to dismiss is GRANTED; and Defendant McGuinness is dismissed from this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. September 29, 2010 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2