Price v. Cunningham et al
ORDER VACATING Defendants' 19 Motion to Dismiss from Court's Calendar Pending Objection Deadline signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 3/22/2011. (Sant Agata, S)
-SMS (PC) Price v. Cunningham et al
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
The Court's action is purely administrative and the parties need take no further action. Once the objection period is closed, the Court will issue its ruling on the motion.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FRED PRICE, Plaintiff, v. S. R. CUNNINGHAM, et al.,
CASE NO. 1:08-cv-00425-AWI-SKO PC ORDER VACATING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS FROM COURT'S CALENDAR PENDING OBJECTION DEADLINE (Docs. 19 and 27) Defendants. /
On June 15, 2010, Defendants Cunningham and Mullins filed a motion seeking revocation of Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and the Magistrate Judge recommended the motion be granted on March 10, 2011. The objection deadline does not expire until April 14, 2011, and the parties have fourteen days, plus three days for service, which to file a response to any objections. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d); Local Rule 304(d). In light of 28 U.S.C. § 476(a)(1), the Civil Justice Reform Act, and because the Court cannot yet rule on Defendants' pending motion, the motion is DEEMED VACATED from the Court's calendar until (1) objections are timely filed and the response period expires, or (2) the thirty-day objection period expires without receipt of objections.1 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 0m8i78 March 22, 2011 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?