Antoine v. Witcher et al
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, with Prejudice, for Failure to State a Claim upon which relief may be Granted, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/22/09. CASE CLOSED(Gil-Garcia, A)
1 2 3 4 PAUL ANTOINE, 5 Plaintiff, 6 v. 7 M. WITCHER, et al., 8 Defendants. 9 / 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: b9ed48 January 22, 2009 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Paul Antoine ("Plaintiff") is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil action, which was removed from Kern County Superior Court on March 24, 2008, by Defendants Witcher, Meadors, Avalos, Amos, Boyer, and Perez. On September 19, 2008, the Magistrate Judge dismissed Plaintiff's complaint for failure to state any claims upon which relief may be granted and ordered Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within thirty days. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Plaintiff was granted a thirty-day extension of time to amend on October 29, 2008. To date, Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the Court's order. As a result, there is no pleading on file which sets forth any claims upon which relief may be granted under section 1983. Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, this action is HEREBY DISMISSED, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff's failure to state any claims upon which relief may be granted. (Doc. 7) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED CASE NO. 1:08-cv-00426-LJO-SMS PC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?