Washington v. Yates

Filing 18

{VACATED per order 21 .} ORDER to SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH A 17 COURT ORDER and ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO SERVE ORDER ON ATTORNEY GENERAL signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 1/21/2009. ( Show Cause Filing due 2/12/2009.) (Figueroa, O)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 20 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 21 On December 8, 2008, the undersigned issued an order directing Respondent "to provide a 22 copy of the parole board hearing decision and further brief the issue of mootness as it relates to the 23 parole decision within thirty (30) days of the date of service of [the] order." Over thirty (30) days 24 have passed, and Respondent has not responded to the court order. Local Rule 11-110 provides: 25 "Failure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or with any order of the Court may be 26 grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within 27 the inherent power of the Court." 28
U . S . D i s t r ic t C o u r t E. D . C a lifo r n ia cd

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

KURT WASHINGTON,

) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) ) JAMES YATES, ) ) Respondent. ) ____________________________________)

1:08-CV-00431 LJO SMS HC ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER [Doc. #17] ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO SERVE ORDER ON ATTORNEY GENERAL

1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
U . S . D i s t r ic t C o u r t E. D . C a lifo r n ia cd

Accordingly, Respondent is HEREBY ORDERED to, within fifteen (15) days of service of this order, SHOW CAUSE why appropriate sanctions should not be imposed for failing to comply with a court order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: icido3 January 21, 2009 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2