Rosenblum v. Mule Creek State Prison Medical Staff et al

Filing 14

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Stephen M. McNamee on 1/7/2009, The Court advises the parties that the Court is conducting statutory screening.The matter will proceed following the issuance of the statutory screening order. (Figueroa, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Mule Creek State Prison Medical Staff, ) ) et. al., ) ) Defendants. ) Philip Rosenblum, No. 1:08-CV-00448-SMM ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(a), when a prisoner files a civil rights complaint seeking redress from a governmental entity, officer, or employee, the Court must screen the complaint "as soon as practicable" after docketing. 28 U.S.C. 1915A(a). If a plaintiff has raised claims that are legally frivolous or malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief, then the Court must dismiss the complaint or any portion thereof. 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1), (2). At this time, the above-captioned case has not been statutorily screened. The Court advises the parties that the Court is conducting statutory screening. The matter will proceed following the issuance of the statutory screening order. DATED this 7th day of January, 2009.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?