Rosenblum v. Mule Creek State Prison Medical Staff et al

Filing 53

ORDER Denying Motion for Modification of Scheduling Order 50 , signed by Senior Judge Stephen M. McNamee on 6/14/2010. (Verduzco, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Mule Creek State Prison Medical Staff, et) ) al., ) ) Defendants. ) Phillip Rosenblum, No. CV 1-08-0448-SMM ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Modification of Scheduling Order, filed May 18, 2010 (Doc. 50). To date, Defendants have not filed a response. However, in examining Plaintiff's motion, there is no certificate of service attached showing that a copy of the filing was served on counsel for Defendants. As a result, the Court will deny Plaintiff's motion without prejudice to Plaintiff refiling the document upon proper service on counsel for Defendants. Plaintiff must serve Defendants, or counsel if an appearance has been entered, a copy of every document that he files. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a). Each filing must include a certificate stating that a copy of the filing was served. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Modification of Scheduling Order (Doc. 50) without prejudice. Plaintiff may re-file the motion upon proper service on counsel for Defendants. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED this 14th day of June, 2010. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?